Agent-relative positive duties

A lot of moral theorists are sceptics about Act Consequentialism (AC). For example, some of these sceptics think that we need to qualify AC with the following two agent-relative elements: (i) “deontological constraints”, which forbid us to do certain horrible acts even if those horrible […] Read More

Welcome Ralph Wedgwood

We are pleased to announce that Ralph Wedgwood has accepted our invitation to blog here at PEA Soup.  Ralph is CUF Lecturer   in Philosophy, and Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy, Merton   College, Oxford.  It’s great to have you aboard, Ralph!

A New Conference

Call for papers and other details concerning the the First Annual Conference of the Northwestern University Society for Ethical Theory and Polical Philosophy can be found here.

Mackie and disagreement revisited

Having posted on Mackie’s argument from relativity some time ago, I’d like to return to it now and ask whether the argument (or at least what I think is the best version of it) is inconsistent with other components of Mackie’s error theory. In its […] Read More

A fine waste of time

Several of you might have heard of this excellent philosophical time waster before, but it’s new to me (apparently it was first devised by Wilfrid Sellars):Identify three foods A, B, and C such that any two of these are complementary (taste good in combination) but […] Read More

Notable Ethics Articles 2005-2006

REPOSTING After Keith DeRose’s recent post on the apparent end of The Philosopher’s Annual, Brian Weatherson suggested that some blogs, such as PEA Soup, might help take over their task (see this Certain Doubts post for more discussion).  For various reasons, we’re not quite prepared […] Read More