Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Author: Ralph Wedgwood

Metaethics Posted onJuly 25, 2015August 4, 2016

Rationality is permissibility

Many philosophers seem to think that – even if the notions of a belief’s being “justified” or “rational” are indeed normative notions, as is widely held […] Read More

Ideas, Metaethics Posted onFebruary 9, 2015August 5, 2016

Is normative necessity distinct from metaphysical necessity?

In “Varieties of Necessity” (in Gendler and Hawthorne, Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford 2002), Kit Fine argued that we need to recognize that certain normative truths […] Read More

Uncategorized Posted onJuly 7, 2014

State-given reasons for and against intending

In my previous post, I argued that there are state-given reasons not to believe certain propositions. In this post, I shall argue that there are […] Read More

Uncategorized Posted onJuly 5, 2014

State-given reasons not to believe

According to a common view, the difference between the “right” kind of reasons that support the distinctive rationality of belief, intention, or other attitudes, and […] Read More

Uncategorized Posted onMay 3, 2014

Against Ideal Theory

In many of the normative and evaluative branches of philosophy, philosophers have devised “ideal theories”—e.g. theories of what it is for an agent to be […] Read More

Academia Posted onAugust 22, 2013

Thought now accepting submissions in Value Theory

The new journal Thought is now accepting submissions in Value Theory (broadly interpreted, to include all of ethical theory and metaethics). I am the new […] Read More

Moral Psychology Posted onMarch 21, 2011

Three Senses of ‘End’

Ever since Aristotle, the terms that are translated ‘end’ (e.g. the Greek word telos and the Latin finis) have played a starring role in ethical […] Read More

Metaethics, Value Theory Posted onJanuary 24, 2011

What is instrumental goodness?

In “Two Distinctions in Goodness” (Philosophical Review 1983), Christine Korsgaard argued that the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic goodness should not be conflated with the […] Read More

Academia, News and Events Posted onNovember 9, 2010

Job at Oxford: Ethicists encouraged to apply

Tutorial Fellowship and University Lecturership in Philosophy (Corpus Christi College) This is to replace John Tasioulas, who has now accepted the Quain Chair in Jurisprudence […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

No upcoming events

CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2026 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab