Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Applied Ethics, Ideas, Moral Psychology

The Truth about Lying

Posted onJanuary 30, 2015August 5, 2016

Photo credit: Tristan Schmurr Lying is an important social and moral category. We react negatively to liars and their lies. But what is it to lie? The standard view in philosophy and social science is that a lie is a dishonest assertion. This view goes […] Read More

Discussions

Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup: Derek Baker & Jack Woods’ “How Expressivists Can and Should Explain Inconsistency,” with a critical précis by Mark Schroeder

Posted onJanuary 26, 2015August 5, 2016

Please join us in discussing Derek Baker and Jack Woods‘ paper “How Expressivists Can and Should Explain Inconsistency,” available open access here. Mark Schroeder opens the discussion with a critical précis below the fold.

Uncategorized

Daily Nous Discussion of Philosophy Journal Practices

Posted onJanuary 21, 2015

Here. Many editors of important journals tell us about the editorial practices of their journals.

Discussions

Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup: Upcoming attractions

Posted onJanuary 9, 2015August 5, 2016

We have two exciting Ethics discussions coming up: On January 26-28, we discuss Derek Baker and Jack Woods‘ paper “How Expressivists Can and Should Explain Inconsistency,” available open access here. Mark Schroeder has kindly agreed to open the discussion with a critical précis.  On February […] Read More

Featured Philosophers

Coming Featured Philosophers

Posted onJanuary 8, 2015August 7, 2023

Happy New Year! I am happy to share the planned Spring/Summer line up of Featured Philosophers you can look forward to on PEA Soup.  One goal is for the series to reflect diverse people and topics and this list includes people working on (at least!) […] Read More

Ideas, Metaethics

Normative Beliefs and Epistemic Norms

Posted onJanuary 6, 2015August 5, 2016

As a part of a paper I am working on (very early stages and so the rest will be very sketchy), I would like to argue that different epistemic norms govern normative beliefs and other beliefs with ordinary, purely naturalist contents. By epistemic norms I […] Read More

Uncategorized

CFP: The ninth annual Felician Conference on Ethics and Public Affairs

Posted onJanuary 5, 2015

The ninth annual Felician Conference on Ethics and Public Affairs will be held at the Rutherford Campus of Felician College, 223 Montross Ave., Rutherford, NJ 07070 on Saturday, April 25, 2015, 9 am – 6 pm Our plenary speaker is James Stacey Taylor (The College of […] Read More

Academia, The Profession

Do cover letters for journal submissions make any difference?

Posted onJanuary 3, 2015

I'm curious to know whether cover letters that accompany journal submissions make any difference — whether editors read them, whether the letters influence publication decisions, etc. I've always treated this as pro forma: "Dear Editors, Please consider this manuscript for a future issue ofthe journal," […] Read More

Ideas

Ordinary Language or Just Ordinary English?

Posted onDecember 25, 2014August 5, 2016

This is related to the Finlay thread, but I thought it might raise more general questions. One of the most famous sets of normative statements in Western culture would be the Ten Commandments. These were written in a language that simply does not have a […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

  • Ethics - David O'Brien. ‘Can luck egalitarians handle self-sacrifice?’. Précis by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen October 29, 2026 – October 30, 2026
  • Free & Equal - Niko Kolodny. 'Can Contractualism Be an Account of What We Owe to Each Other?' Précis by Clara Lingle November 4, 2026 – November 5, 2026
  • PEA Soup Book Discussion - Theron Pummer December 2, 2026 – December 3, 2026
CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2026 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab