Call for Abstracts

The first Annual Arizona Workshop on Normative Ethics will take place in Tucson, Arizona, at the Westward Look Resort on January 7-9, 2010. Keynote speakers will be Thomas E. Hill (UNC, Chapel Hill), Holly Smith (Rutgers), and Peter Railton (Michigan). Those interested in presenting a […] Read More

Good and Bad

Sometimes I hear people (well, philosophers) compare the goodness of one thing with the badness of another. They say, for example, the goodness of pleasure is less than the badness of pain; or pleasure is less good than pain is bad. Do such comparisons make […] Read More

Defending Double Effect

According to the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE), there is a morally significant difference between (i) the consequences of an action that were intended by the agent and (ii) the consequences that were not intended, but are merely foreseen side-effects of the action. More precisely, according […] Read More

Expressivism and Self-Refutation

Here is a worry for (pure) expressivism.  I think it is new.  I am not sure how cogent it is, and this is probably not its most elegant formulation.  So help is welcome.  Consider (1)    No ought-claim is true. Construe ‘ought-claim’ to include (1) itself.  […] Read More

Welcome, Adrienne Martin!

We are pleased to announce that Adrienne Martin, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania, has accepted our invitation to become a contributor here at PEA Soup.  Adrienne works on agency, practical reasoning, and Kantian ethics.  Her writings have appeared in such publications […] Read More

Enjoying immorality for its own sake.

I feel certain someone has already discussed the following problem, but I'm frustrated that I don't remember who and where.  Anyway: Suppose there is some action whose consequences, it appears, are on balance slightly bad.  (Perhaps a boy steals a candy bar from a store.) […] Read More