Metaethics, Semantics, and Metasemantics

One thing I’ve become much more aware of in Leeds is the distinction between semantics and metasemantics. There is a worry that ignoring this distinction is creating some confusion. Metaethicists have traditionally claimed to be doing moral semantics whereas in fact they have mainly been doing metasemantics. […] Read More

Evolution, Emotion, and Metaethics Workshop

University of Sydney, Aug 6-7Organizer: Richard Joyce (richard.jo…@arts.usyd.edu.au) SPEAKERS: David Copp (UC Davis)Justin D'Arms (Ohio State)Janice Dowell (Nebraska-Lincoln)Jamie Dreier (Brown)Josh Gert (Florida State)Daniel Jacobson (University of Michigan)Don Loeb (Vermont)David Sobel (Nebraska-Lincoln)Kim Sterelny (ANU) Further info, including venue, will be announced in due course. There is […] Read More

Nietzschean Expressivist Semantics

One of the more serious attempts to provide an expressivist semantics for moral terms (broadly construed) is Gibbard’s.  The basic idea is that they express plans.  “I should pack” expresses my plan to pack; “You should pack” expresses a contingency plan for the (unlikely) case […] Read More

Too many distinctions in value

Perhaps three isn't too many, but it does feel unwieldy.  Nevertheless, it seems to me these are all different distinctions in value, even though many people write as if they are the same: 1. Extrinsic-intrinsic 2. Conditional-unconditional 3. Priceable-priceless Whether something has extrinsic or intrinsic […] Read More