Welcome to our discussion of Christian Barry and Garrett Cullity’s “Offsetting and Risk Imposition,” published in the most recent issue of Ethics. You can find […] Read More
Category: Journal Discussions
Welcome to our discussion of Emily Tilton and Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa’s “Not What I Agreed To: Content and Consent”, published in the most recent issue […] Read More
Welcome to our highly anticipated discussion of Sukaina Hirji‘s “Oppressive Double Binds,” published in the most recent issue of Ethics. You can find the paper […] Read More
and I welcome you to the discussion of Itai Sher‘s recent “How perspective-based aggregation undermines the Pareto principle” (free access through July 3rd here). To […] Read More
and I welcome you to the discussion of Natalie Gold‘s recent “The Limits of Commodification Arguments: Framing, motivation crowding, and shared valuations” (also available here). […] Read More
Ram Neta writes: Dandelet’s paper presents a novel puzzle – what she calls “The Puzzle of Self-Gaslighting”. She introduces the puzzle by describing a story […] Read More
Welcome to this weekend’s discussion of Anthony Kelley‘s “The Welfare-Nihilist Arguments Against Judgement Subjectivism“. We encourage you to share your thoughts in the comments section. […] Read More
Welcome to our highly anticipated discussion of Michelle Madden Dempsey‘s “Coercion, Consent, and Time.” The paper is published in the most recent issue of Ethics; you […] Read More
Recently, Romy Vekony, Alfred Mele, and David Rose published “Intentional Action without Knowledge” in Synthese. Here’s a link. Matt King disagrees with them. He has […] Read More