Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Category: Discussions

Metaethics Posted onMarch 29, 2010

Brian Leiter’s Nietzschean Argument for Moral Scepticism

Brian Leiter has posted a short essay developing a Nietzschean argument for moral scepticism on the web site of the National Humanities Center On the […] Read More

Moral Psychology Posted onMarch 26, 2010

All Things Considered?

I'm reading Wedgwood's discussion of Normative Judgement Internalism (NJI), which has prompted me to think the following: Philosophers often refer to all-things-considered judgments about what […] Read More

Value Theory Posted onMarch 19, 2010

Animal welfare and Kant’s unconditioned/conditioned good distinction

Inspired a bit by Ralph's post critiquing Kant's view of unconditioned or fundamental goods, I've been investigating why Kant arrives at his (in my opinion) […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onMarch 16, 2010

How much do moral philosophers disagree?

At the end of this month, I am due to respond to Brian Leiter's essay "Moral Skepticism and Moral Disagreement in Nietzsche", on the National […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onMarch 15, 2010

Reasons as Evidence and Holism

As most of you know, Daniel Star and Stephen Kearns have recently made an interesting, original proposal of what reasons are generally speaking (see, for […] Read More

Academia Posted onMarch 9, 2010

Survey: Teaching Contemporary Moral Issues and Problems

Nathan Nobis writes: I have created a survey to try to identify which topics are most commonly addressed in introductory ethics courses that have a […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onFebruary 24, 2010

Intuitionism and Social Reliabilism

Moral epistemology is an area of metaethics that I feel most uneasy about. I’ve done the least research in this area, and I’m never quite […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onFebruary 18, 2010

Moral Obligation Applies to Act-Types, Not Act-Tokens

In a couple of conversations that I’ve had recently, I’ve been surprised to find that several moral philosophers believe that when we are morally obliged […] Read More

Academia, Practical Rationality, The Profession Posted onFebruary 16, 2010

SLACRR program

St. Louis Annual Conference on Reason and Rationality UM-St. Louis May 23-25, 2010 Moonrise Hotel The Department of Philosophy at UM-St. Louis is pleased to […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

  • PEA Soup Book Discussion - Theron Pummer December 2, 2026 – December 3, 2026
CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2026 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab