Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Category: Discussions

Normative Ethics, Value Theory Posted onMay 2, 2010

The Virtue Responsive Evil Demon

Suppose you are an ordinary virtuous agent. Up until now, you haven’t lived the kind of life that involves making any huge life or death […] Read More

Normative Ethics, Value Theory Posted onApril 24, 2010

Objective Consequentialism and Deliberation

I’m starting to warm up to the objectivist form of act-consequentialism (partly because I think it lacks content) which Doug defended in the previous post. […] Read More

The Profession Posted onApril 22, 2010

Speeding up the journal review process: How economists are doing it

Leave it to our colleagues in economics to find an efficient way to speed up the journal review and publication process. Inside Higher Ed reports […] Read More

Normative Ethics Posted onApril 21, 2010

Consequentialism and Uncertainty

Let us define objective consequentialism and subjective consequentialism, respectively, as follows: OC: S’s performing x is morally permissible if and only if, and because, there […] Read More

Moral Psychology Posted onApril 16, 2010

Templeton Foundation’s Big Question Series: “Does Moral Action Depend on Reasoning?”

    PeaSoupers may be interested to read a series of essays sponsored by the Templeton Foundation on the question, "Does Moral Action Depend on Reasoning?"  […] Read More

Moral Psychology Posted onApril 9, 2010

Emotion, reason, and moral convictions

In Nature, psychologist Paul Bloom has published a short rejoinder to 'social intuitionist' claims that rational deliberation has no role in shaping our moral convictions. […] Read More

Moral Psychology Posted onMarch 31, 2010

How Humeans Can Explain Reason-Choosing

One objection to Humean views about motivation, and to the 'Standard Model' of intention on which intentions are complexes of desire and belief, is that […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onMarch 29, 2010

Brian Leiter’s Nietzschean Argument for Moral Scepticism

Brian Leiter has posted a short essay developing a Nietzschean argument for moral scepticism on the web site of the National Humanities Center On the […] Read More

Moral Psychology Posted onMarch 26, 2010

All Things Considered?

I'm reading Wedgwood's discussion of Normative Judgement Internalism (NJI), which has prompted me to think the following: Philosophers often refer to all-things-considered judgments about what […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

  • Ethics - Kimberley Brownlee and Alyssa Izatt. ‘Justice for Girls: On the Provision of Abortion as Adequate Care’. Précis by Japa Pallikkathayil April 29, 2026 – April 30, 2026
CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2026 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab