Welcome to Kyle Swan

On behalf of all of us here at PEA Soup, I extend a warm welcome to Kyle Swan, who, happily, has accepted our invitation to be a contributor. Kyle is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota Duluth, specializes in ethical theory, […] Read More

Past Desires

Consider the following example from Parfit’s Reasons and Persons: When I was young what I most wanted was to be a poet. This desire was not conditional on its own persistence. I did not want to be a poet only if this would later still […] Read More

Failing the Envy Test

Ronald Dworkin argues, in two lengthy papers (“What is Equality? Parts 1 and 2”, P&PA 1981), that, if we care about equality at all, then we should care about equality of resources — as opposed to, in particular, equality of welfare. Central to his argument […] Read More

The responsible and the deterrable

Ever come across an argument that you just know can’t be right but you can’t pin down its flaw? I had that experience recently while reading an older paper on punishment, Alan Wertheimer’s “Deterrence and retribution.” (Ethics 86 (1976): 181-199) Quick background: Retributivists about criminal […] Read More

Welcome to Jason Kawall

On behalf of all of us here at PEA Soup, I extend a warm welcome to Jason Kawall, who has graciously accepted our invitation to be a contributor. Jason Kawall is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Colgate University. He specializes in ethics, epistemology, and […] Read More

The Importance of What’s Appropriate

A common picture of value determination with respect to pains, pleasures and other such mental states seems to be the following: the intrinsic value of such states is determined by their phenomenological character. Thus, some people hold that all pleasures are intrinsically good, and all […] Read More