![](https://peasoupblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/F1DD9BC6-3D83-4ADF-958D-885D1D154A99-e1687178729875.gif)
Welcome to our highly anticipated discussion of Michelle Madden Dempsey‘s “Coercion, Consent, and Time.” The paper is published in the most recent issue of Ethics; you […] Read More
Welcome to our highly anticipated discussion of Michelle Madden Dempsey‘s “Coercion, Consent, and Time.” The paper is published in the most recent issue of Ethics; you […] Read More
Recently, Romy Vekony, Alfred Mele, and David Rose published “Intentional Action without Knowledge” in Synthese. Here’s a link. Matt King disagrees with them. He has […] Read More
Welcome to our discussion of Chong-Ming Lim’s “Vandalizing Tainted Commemorations”! Joanna Burch-Brown has graciously provided a critical précis, which appears below. Chong-Ming will offer an […] Read More
Welcome to what we expect will be a very interesting and productive discussion of Patrick Tomlin‘s “Proportionality in War: Revising Revisionism.” The paper is published […] Read More
Welcome to what promises to be an engaging discussion of Aidan McGlynn’s “Objects or Others? Epistemic Agency and the Primary Harm of Testimonial Injustice.” The […] Read More
Welcome to our highly anticipated discussion of Joe Horton‘s “Aggregation, Risk, and Reductio.” The paper is published in the most recent issue of Ethics; you can […] Read More
Welcome to what we expect will be a very interesting and productive discussion of Gerard Vong‘s “Weighing up Weighted Lotteries: Scarcity, Overlap Cases, and Fair […] Read More
and I welcome you to the discussion of Maxime Lepoutre’s “Rage inside the machine: Defending the place of anger in democratic speech.” To kick off […] Read More
Welcome to what we expect will be a very interesting and productive discussion of Marcello Di Bello and Collin O’Neill’s “Profile Evidence, Fairness, and the […] Read More