I’m unsuccesfully trying to have a break from blogging to get some work done. I cannot resist the temptation to advertise a book review of […] Read More
Category: Discussions
Check out this interview on MSNBC with Psychiatrist Dr. Donald E. Rosen, conducted by MSNBC health editor Jane Weaver. I’m breaking it down FJM-style.
In her very good article in the latest Ethics (117, Oct. ’06), “Kantian Rigorism and Mitigating Circumstances,” Tamar Schapiro brings to light a problem with […] Read More
Over at Leiter Reports, there’s an interesting discussion of the lack of venues for publishing discussion notes — see here. The problem is that few […] Read More
Think of the person who loves you more than anyone else in this world does. And now think about how that person would feel if […] Read More
I’d like to raise what I imagine may be a touchy subject but one worth the attention of those in the philosophy profession: We occasionally […] Read More
A lot of moral theorists are sceptics about Act Consequentialism (AC). For example, some of these sceptics think that we need to qualify AC with […] Read More
Here’s a quote from Scanlon: A rational person who judges that there to be sufficient grounds for believing that P normally has that belief, and […] Read More
Having posted on Mackie’s argument from relativity some time ago, I’d like to return to it now and ask whether the argument (or at least […] Read More