Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Category: Normative Ethics

Normative Ethics Posted onApril 13, 2007

Pluralist Universalism

In his new book, Moral Value and Human Diversity, Robert Audi introduces a brand-new ethical theory called pluralist universalism. It is not altogether new but […] Read More

Normative Ethics Posted onMarch 28, 2007

Is equality good?

Welfare Egalitarianism (hereafter, Egalitarianism) is the view that it is intrinsically good for people to be equally well off. Or more generally: it is intrinsically […] Read More

Normative Ethics Posted onMarch 3, 2007

Schapiro on Kantian Rigorism

In her very good article in the latest Ethics (117, Oct. ’06), “Kantian Rigorism and Mitigating Circumstances,” Tamar Schapiro brings to light a problem with […] Read More

Normative Ethics Posted onFebruary 12, 2007

Agent-relative positive duties

A lot of moral theorists are sceptics about Act Consequentialism (AC). For example, some of these sceptics think that we need to qualify AC with […] Read More

Metaethics, Value Theory Posted onJanuary 24, 2007

The Buck-Passing Account of Value and a False Dichotomy

Consider the following passage from Scanlon:   [B]eing good, or valuable, is not a property that itself provides a reason to respond to a thing […] Read More

Normative Ethics Posted onJanuary 15, 2007

Parfit on Scanlon

Something has always bothered me about Parfit’s treatment of Scanlon’s contractualism both in his "Justifiability to Each Other" and in the new Climbing the Mountain. […] Read More

Metaethics, Normative Ethics Posted onJanuary 11, 2007

Philosophical Utilitarianism

In “Contractualism and Utilitarianism” Scanlon introduces what he calls “philosophical utilitarianism” (PU). PU is the view that “the only fundamental moral facts are facts about individual […] Read More

Metaethics, Moral Psychology, Normative Ethics, Practical Rationality Posted onDecember 26, 2006

Scanlon oddities

As everyone knows, I ‘Reealy’ like Scanlon’s What We Owe to Each Other. One good thing about the book is that every time you read […] Read More

Normative Ethics Posted onDecember 18, 2006

Taxonomy in Ethics

Lately I’ve been thinking about taxonomy of philosophical views, especially in the area of normative ethics. Here’s a fragment of a common taxonomy of ethical […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

  • Ethics - Kimberley Brownlee and Alyssa Izatt. ‘Justice for Girls: On the Provision of Abortion as Adequate Care’. Précis by Japa Pallikkathayil April 29, 2026 – April 30, 2026
CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2026 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab