Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Category: Metaethics

Metaethics Posted onDecember 8, 2005

Pragmatics of ‘Ought’

In my post on the semantics of ‘ought’, I intimated that my end-relational analysis of ‘ought’ could also handle categorical uses, but tried to bracket […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onDecember 6, 2005

Semantics of ‘Ought’

For my first post, here’s something on the semantics of ‘ought’ that I’ve been working on. I’m pretty excited about it, so maybe someone can […] Read More

Moral Psychology, Practical Rationality Posted onNovember 2, 2005

Are akratics free?

I had to choose between two mutually exclusive courses of action, A and B.  I judged that doing A was better, all things considered, than […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onOctober 3, 2005

Do We Have a Shared Concept of ‘Rightness’?

I’ve been meaning to post this question for a while, but kept thinking that I ought to do some proper research on the topic.  Fortunately, […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onAugust 16, 2005

“Dear moral expert …”

If there are moral experts, this would seem to have important implications for a number of issues in philosophical ethics.  So who is a moral […] Read More

Practical Rationality, Value Theory Posted onApril 29, 2005

Harry Frankfurt, Value Objectivist

Value objectivists like myself tend to think of practical reasoning as the process by which an agent forms beliefs about what things have value, and […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onDecember 29, 2004

A Divine Copp Out

I promise to avoid bad puns in future titles. David Copp advances a “society-centered” theory (SCT) of the justification of moral standards in Morality, Normativity, […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onDecember 14, 2004

Dreier and Negating an Attitude

In Madison, Jamie, echoing Nicholas Unwin, posed a problem for expressivists generally, and for Gibbard specifically.  As I understand it, the problem is that expressivists […] Read More

Metaethics Posted onDecember 2, 2004

Interview with Blackburn

Jason was in Syracuse yesterday, and told me about this interview with Simon Blackburn from a couple of years ago: http://www.cfh.ufsc.br/ethic@/ETICA1~1.PRN.pdf Blackburn’s explanation of quasi-realism […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

  • Ethics - Kimberley Brownlee and Alyssa Izatt. ‘Justice for Girls: On the Provision of Abortion as Adequate Care’. Précis by Japa Pallikkathayil April 29, 2026 – April 30, 2026
CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2026 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab