Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Author: Ralph Wedgwood

Action Theory (Philosophy of Action), Discussions, Ideas, Practical Rationality Posted onOctober 10, 2020

An argument for holism about practical rationality

What fundamentally exemplifies the property of practical rationality? According to atomism, it is fundamentally each particular intention that an agent might have at a time […] Read More

Discussions, Ideas, Normative Ethics Posted onNovember 18, 2019November 18, 2019

Weighing Aggregative and Non-aggregative Considerations

In a famous passage in What We Owe to Each Other, T.M. Scanlon introduced a case where we have to choose between saving one person […] Read More

Happiness, Value Theory Posted onJuly 12, 2019

The quality of pains

Chap. 2 of J. S. Mill’s Utilitarianism is widely interpreted as defending qualitative hedonism, as a view about the nature of personal well-being. On views of […] Read More

Ideas, Normative Ethics Posted onFebruary 17, 2019February 20, 2019

Ethical intuitions concern types of case, not particular cases

Undoubtedly, philosophers do make moral judgments about particular cases. For example, they make judgments about actual historical cases – as G.E.M. Anscombe famously judged that […] Read More

Ideas, Normative Ethics, Value Theory Posted onNovember 27, 2018November 27, 2018

Non-Welfarist Population Ethics (by Ralph Wedgwood)

Most contemporary work in population ethics operates within the framework of welfarism – the assumption that individual welfare is the fundamental value. But this framework is […] Read More

Ideas, Metaethics, Value Theory Posted onOctober 24, 2018October 24, 2018

There is No Moral Vagueness

In this post, I shall argue for the conclusion that there is no such thing as moral vagueness. The argument rests on a certain assumption, […] Read More

Ideas, Moral Psychology Posted onJanuary 27, 2017January 27, 2017

Both Humeans and Kantians about Motivation are Wrong

Both Hume and Kant advocated extreme and implausible views of motivation; the same is also true of many of their contemporary followers. The truth about […] Read More

Ideas, Metaethics, Practical Rationality, Reasons and rationality Posted onJuly 8, 2016September 8, 2016

Objective and subjective akrasia

Suppose that there is both an objective ‘ought’ and a subjective ‘ought’. Which of these two kinds of ‘ought’ figures in the anti-akrasia principle that […] Read More

Ideas, Normative Ethics, Value Theory Posted onOctober 13, 2015August 3, 2016

Permissible suboptimality: A triple-ranking view

Some philosophers – let’s call them “teleologists” – believe that there is an intimate connection between deontic terms like ‘required’, ‘ought’, and ‘permissible’, on the one hand, […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

  • Erin Kelly - PEA Soup Book Discussion May 21, 2025 – May 22, 2025
  • Ethics - David Sobel and Steven Wall “The Subjective/Objective Distinction in Well-Being” Précis by Chris Heathwood May 28, 2025 – May 29, 2025
  • Theron Pummer - PEA Soup Book Discussion June 18, 2025 – June 19, 2025
CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2025 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab