My previous pre-vital nonexistence is not, and was not, bad for me. My previous pre-vital nonexistence is relevantly similar to my forthcoming post-mortem nonexistence—that is, […] Read More
Author: David Sobel
Pea Soup’s own Ben Bradley recently had his paper, "Against Satisficing Consequentialism" win the 2005 Dartmouth ISUS (International Society for Utilitarian Studies) Conference paper prize. […] Read More
Inspired by Uriah’s post below, I invent a new kind of zombie (a hedonic-zombie), draw a distinction between strong and weak internalism about the good […] Read More
Over the past few years, I’ve become aware of some interesting ethical dilemmas for editors and referees. I present five such dilemmas below: D1-D5. Some […] Read More
Broadly construed, a theory is consequentialist (or teleological, if you prefer) iff it takes the deontic status of an action to be solely a function […] Read More
It seems to me that there are not only reasons for action, but also reasons for belief and even reasons for having certain feelings and […] Read More
A Conference at Bowling Green State University April 7-9, 2006
Consequentialism, many philosophers have claimed, asks too much of us to be a plausible ethical theory. Indeed, consequentialism’s severe demandingness is often claimed to be […] Read More
The conference is on the philosophical challenge of naturalism, and it is being hosted by the Rutgers Institute for Law and Philosophy. The conference will […] Read More
