Testing Your Moral Sense

So here’s something fun.   You can take a "moral sense" quiz, through a project at Harvard, by clicking here.  It takes about 15 minutes, and you can also register for updates at the end.  It’s testing your reactions to various moral scenarios, some of which […] Read More

Pragmatics of ‘Ought’

In my post on the semantics of ‘ought’, I intimated that my end-relational analysis of ‘ought’ could also handle categorical uses, but tried to bracket that claim and those uses out of the conversation. Kris has invited me to explain, however, and so here I […] Read More

Souper Peas Do It Again

Pea Soup’s own Ben Bradley recently had his paper, "Against Satisficing Consequentialism" win the 2005 Dartmouth ISUS (International Society for Utilitarian Studies) Conference paper prize. Congrats Ben!

Semantics of ‘Ought’

For my first post, here’s something on the semantics of ‘ought’ that I’ve been working on. I’m pretty excited about it, so maybe someone can burst my bubble. It’s striking that the deontic terms (‘ought’, ‘must’, ‘have to’, ‘might’, ‘may’, etc.) are also modal terms. […] Read More

Ethics Papers at Eastern APA

Following the lead from Certain Doubts and Experimental Philosophy, I thought it might be helpful to post the ethics-related papers that will be presented at the upcoming Eastern APA.   There are, of course, other papers relevant to ethics (e.g., papers on race, inclusiveness, etc.).  If […] Read More

Hedonic-Zombies and the Good Life

Inspired by Uriah’s post below, I invent a new kind of zombie (a hedonic-zombie), draw a distinction between strong and weak internalism about the good life, and argue that Nagelian thought experiments involving hedonic-zombies support weak, not strong, internatlism. First, some definitions: