The Irrelevance of Harm

In Mike Almeida’s recent post, this topic came up:  what is it for a person to harm someone?  I’m interested in a more general question: what is it for an event or state of affairs to harm someone?  Here’s the view I like best: (H) […] Read More

The Nagelian Argument Against Hedonism

In his seminal paper, “Death”, Nagel writes the following: Someone who holds that all goods and evils must be temporally assignable states of the person may of course try to bring more complicated cases into line by pointing to the pleasure or pain that the […] Read More

Welcome Laurie Shrage!

Laurie Shrage has kindly accepted our invitation to become a contributor to PEA Soup.  Laurie is a Professor at California State Polytechnic University.  As noted previously on this site, she has also started up the APA Governance blog, and we look forward to her contributions […] Read More

Marginal Cases and Early Term Fetuses

The marginal cases argument (MCA) has been used very effectively in defense of the direct moral standing of sentient non-humans. Any being that has direct moral standing is such that our treatment of them matters directly, independently of how it affects others. Direct moral standing […] Read More

The is-ought gap

In another thread, A.N. Prior’s attempted refutation of the is/ought gap came up. Here’s one of Prior’s examples: a. Tea-drinking is common in England.b. Therefore, tea-drinking is common in England, or all New Zealanders ought to be shot. (a) entails (b), (a) is descriptive, and […] Read More