The latest appears below the fold.
I’m happy to announce the addition of John Oberdiek to our list of contributors. John is a co-director of the Rutgers Institute for Law and Philosophy, and he’s also on the graduate faculty in the Rutgers department of philosophy. He specializes in — wait for […] Read More
I’m currently reading Roger Crisp’s new book Reasons and the Good. For the most part it is admirably clear and bound to create critical reactions against many of the controversial views and arguments it introduces. Occasionally I wonder though whether I’m just disagreeing too much […] Read More
Below the fold are most of the ethics-related sessions at the upcoming Eastern Division APA. If I’ve missed any session that you think should be added to the list, please feel free to add it in the comment section. Click here for the list in […] Read More
Sometimes philosophy can be even fun. One way to make it fun is to come up with absurd consequences of otherwise plausible views. This time I don’t mean blatantly false consequences but more just funny ones. The other day I was talking with Antti about […] Read More
Does moral theory drive philosophy of action? Here’s what I mean. A main question of philosophy of action is what an action is. It seems to me that the answer to this question is strongly influenced by what type of moral theory one accepts.
Suppose Unrestricted Desire Satisfactionism is true. (UDS, is roughly, the view that how well one’s life is going for oneself is determined by the extent to which one’s desires are satisfied or frustrated.) I have some naive questions about harm given UDS, and some parallel […] Read More
We are pleased to announce that Michelle Mason has accepted our invitation to be a contributor here at PEA Soup. Michelle is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota and specializes in ethics, moral psychology, and theories of practical reason. It’s great to […] Read More
The latest ethics alert appears below the fold.