In “Two Distinctions in Goodness” (Philosophical Review 1983), Christine Korsgaard argued that the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic goodness should not be conflated with the […] Read More
Category: Discussions
At first sight, there seems to be a blatant contradiction between Bernard Williams’s two central theories: his view about thick concepts and his existence-internalism about […] Read More
I’m interested in defending consequentialism against allegations that it represents an inherently perverse perspective, or that the consequentialist agent would have a morally bad character. […] Read More
We are pleased to present the latest installment of PEA Soup's collaboration with Ethics, in which we host a discussion of one article from an […] Read More
We are pleased to announce the next installment of our collaboration with Ethics, in which we host a discussion of one article from each issue […] Read More
As everyone knows, David Chalmers argues in The Conscious Mind against materialism and for dualism about phenomenal properties. On this view, conscious experiences are a […] Read More
Tutorial Fellowship and University Lecturership in Philosophy (Corpus Christi College) This is to replace John Tasioulas, who has now accepted the Quain Chair in Jurisprudence […] Read More
CALL FOR PAPERS AND CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Reasons of Love
International Conference
Institute of Philosophy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium)
30 May-1 June 2011
Dale Jamieson and Robert Elliot (hereafter J&E) have recently formulated a new version of consequentialism. It’s called ‘progressive consequentialism’ (this is in Philosophical Perspectives 2009). […] Read More