Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies
  • Home
  • Journal Discussions
    • Ethics Discussions
    • ETMP Discussions
    • JESP Discussions
    • JMP Discussions
    • P&PA Discussions
    • PPE Discussions
    • Oxford Studies Discussions
  • Book Review Forums
    • PEA Soup Book Reviews
    • Ethics Book Review Forum
  • Soup of the Day
  • News and Events
    • Call for Abstracts
    • Call For Papers
  • Announcements
  • About
    • Mission
    • Our Editorial Team
    • Calendar
    • Editorial and Comments Policies

PEA Soup

A forum for discussing Philosophy, Ethics, and Academia

Category: Value Theory

Metaethics, Value Theory Posted onJanuary 24, 2011

What is instrumental goodness?

In “Two Distinctions in Goodness” (Philosophical Review 1983), Christine Korsgaard argued that the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic goodness should not be conflated with the […] Read More

Normative Ethics, Value Theory Posted onJanuary 3, 2011

Fitting Consequentialist Agents

I’m interested in defending consequentialism against allegations that it represents an inherently perverse perspective, or that the consequentialist agent would have a morally bad character. […] Read More

Normative Ethics, Value Theory Posted onMay 2, 2010

The Virtue Responsive Evil Demon

Suppose you are an ordinary virtuous agent. Up until now, you haven’t lived the kind of life that involves making any huge life or death […] Read More

Normative Ethics, Value Theory Posted onApril 24, 2010

Objective Consequentialism and Deliberation

I’m starting to warm up to the objectivist form of act-consequentialism (partly because I think it lacks content) which Doug defended in the previous post. […] Read More

Value Theory Posted onMarch 19, 2010

Animal welfare and Kant’s unconditioned/conditioned good distinction

Inspired a bit by Ralph's post critiquing Kant's view of unconditioned or fundamental goods, I've been investigating why Kant arrives at his (in my opinion) […] Read More

Metaethics, Value Theory Posted onDecember 10, 2009

Strawson’s Argument for Buck-Passing

In Sir P.F. Strawson’s brilliant 1949 paper ‘Ethical Intuitionism’, I came across a short and seemingly powerful argument for the buck-passing accounts of value and […] Read More

Value Theory Posted onSeptember 8, 2009

Buck-passing bleg

Suppose I wanted to get up to speed on the buck-passing-account literature. What three to five things would you say are "must reading"?

Value Theory Posted onJune 14, 2009

Too many distinctions in value

Perhaps three isn't too many, but it does feel unwieldy.  Nevertheless, it seems to me these are all different distinctions in value, even though many […] Read More

Value Theory Posted onApril 2, 2009

Good and Bad

Sometimes I hear people (well, philosophers) compare the goodness of one thing with the badness of another. They say, for example, the goodness of pleasure […] Read More

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

  • Ethics - Kimberley Brownlee and Alyssa Izatt. ‘Justice for Girls: On the Provision of Abortion as Adequate Care’. Précis by Japa Pallikkathayil April 29, 2026 – April 30, 2026
CELPA Logo
The PEA Soup Blog is run by the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the University of Warwick
© 2026 PEA Soup
Powered by WordPress / Theme by Design Lab